Left is a map of the Britons' regions of the British
Isles, as were identified by Rome, to prove that a British Nation is in
residence.
Top right is the Welsh Flag the "Draig Goch". The
Red-Dragon is connected to some islands and, the Preseli Bluestone
mountain range.
Bottom right is a depiction of a Celtic Shield and
Sword, which shows Celtic artistry and metal casting skills.
To order the book, click on the Orderform red box below
Or you can order the book @ :-
Amazon.co.uk
Or you can order from
Kindle Books UK @
Amazon.co.uk
To order the book, click on the Orderform red box below
Or you can order the book @ :-
Amazon.co.uk
Or you can order from
Kindle Books UK @
Amazon.co.uk
To order the book, click on the Orderform red box below
Or you can order the book @ :-
Amazon.co.uk
Or you can order from
Kindle Books UK @
Amazon.co.uk
To order the book, click on the Orderform red box below
Or you can order the book @ :-
Amazon.co.uk
Or you can order from
Kindle Books UK @
Amazon.co.uk
Also at
http://pointmaster.org.uk |
The Britons defeated the Romans in 55 and 54 BC and sent them packing. After
43 AD the mighty Warrior King, Caradoc, defended against Caesar and his three
Roman Generals and legions for at least seven years, but was betrayed in 50 AD
and he and some of his family were taken to Rome in chains. Caradoc was given
the right of a Chieftain King to address the Senate, to give an impressive
speech, whereby Caradoc and his family were pardoned. Caradoc's sister converted
Romans to Christianity at this time. In about 60 AD allied Celtic Britons with
Boudicca, continued in their fight to defend Britain for its "Freedom", to try
to save all Britons from Rome's slavery. In 410 AD Rome departed and the western
Britons fought the Saxons under the "Draig Goch" banner, up to about 500 - 600
AD (is where the legend of King Arthur derives). After these times, the
Welsh Princes defended ceaselessly and in about 1398 AD the last true Welsh
Prince and King, Owain Glyndwr, joined the Clans under the Draig Goch and fought
a 15 year campaign, to try to give all Britons, their Land and Freedom.
Acquire a free
PC Kindle Reader at this link
amazon.com Kindle for PC
From a true Britons’ point of view
- British people should have
had and should now be given first priority for learning and jobs in Britain.
If the latter had resulted in the past there would be no pressure on the NHS
with the migrants and their families who certainly are pressurising it. Of
course we have had to rely on migrants to work in the NHS because of the
inept teaching decisions of past governments. Apparently migrants increase
the population and this expense is obvious in any simple economic terms. I
believe past politicians orchestrated this to have these people’s votes.
Clearly it’s the politicians who have created this nonsense of which we
private sector taxpayers have to pay for it all. British people should be
trained in all aspects of every working skill from domestics to bricklaying
to doctors and scientists etc. to maintain our own British efficient
society. I would like our tax money spent on our British Nation, period.
- Past governments exported
our heavy industries, of which had supported our light engineering
industries and every trade below it; who’s taxes funded the government and
all the public sector quango’s and civil service. So will any new government
reinstate our rightful British institutions? Does any government realise
that our industries created worth and also help fund the public service
sector and all their quango’s who create in most instances wasteful cost; of
which apparently when cost exceeds worth then bankruptcy must follow. So
will any new government reinstate our British industries and weed out all
the public sector wasteful cost.
- Does any government
realise that the public service sectors and all their quango's are taxed, but
this is a taxing of the private sector paid taxes two-fold; so should the
government realise that ultimately it is the private working-class
industries taxes that pay for everything.
- Why are there generations
of Council workers in multitudes of Council departments; who create more
departments when their family’s need a cushy job; and the executives are
paid more than any Prime Minister, isn’t this a total abuse of private
sector taxpayer’s money? Will any government weed out these nepotism jobs
and advertise to allow British people into these jobs; and because clearly
foreign people in high status jobs will take on their own people before
British people.
- A Patent monopoly is
limited to 20 years; so why is the BBC allowed to exceed this length of time
to continually charge the public for a TV license each year, surely the BBC
have exceeded the norm and are taxing us unlawfully.
- Governments have reduced
the age of consent that allows paedophiles’ and perverts’ to trump up this
when caught. Is it because there are paedophiles’ and perverts’ in
government, the church and the media and entertainment industry, who may
promote and lobby for these Laws? Shouldn’t any sexual medical problem be
dealt with on a private personal basis, and not in a young children’s school
where it could be seen as the grooming of impressionable minds? As parents
are worried and complaining about this at certain schools?
- Companies-House is
supposed to be a non-profit making government establishment, so why does it
make about £32,000,000 a year profit which it passes to the DTI, surely this
is the small company’s money which should be utilized to lessen
Companies-House Fees, and to allow small enterprises to flourish to create
more taxes.
- Some of us work hard all
our lives to set up and leave something for our children; however any
government will grave-rob-tax anyone on their hard earned assets and capital
after they die – so do we put all our money in pile to burn it, to stop any
government wasteful grubby hands getting at it to squander it, or do we move
it out of the country, or do we not even try to gain any assets in our
lifetime? Would it be better if governments allowed us to leave our hard
earned assets and capital to our children, so they could continue to work
and accumulate from our set-up, and buy a few new cars or new homes they
would kit out; which would support industry and would create more tax income
for any government in a more positive way – other than any governments
grave-robbing-us. The old question is “what is the difference between a
hooker and the government” and the answer is “a hooker will stop shafting
you when you are dead"!
- Britons’ money in any
British bank is put there by their hard work; so why are savers held to
low interest rates by arrogant bankers who take enormous bonuses and payoffs
as they wish. We bailed out the banks and we are continually paying for it
now, by low savers interest rates. Surely we should get a fair even split on
interest rates because the banks are making quite good interest on lending
our hard earned cash?
- Why do governments allow
wrongdoers and perverts to continue in any government; we should have a
right to sack them of course, but surely these people should be prosecuted
as any person would be?
- Why are government
establishments; and particularly the NHS overrun with mindless managers who
most do absolutely nothing constructive at all, apparently these systems worked
fine by the hands-on matrons before them? And why are the police turned into
clerks to state the obvious of running any station, which takes about 80% of
their time; and surely a simple charge sheet explains any charges made.
- Clearly, corruption is
rife in the European Union, so why does any government contribute our hard
earned cash to it, or would want us to be governed by any corrupt European
Autocratic Super State?
- Why do the FOS (Financial
Ombudsman Service and other Ombudsman Services) who are subsidized by our
taxes, including public owned banks etc. mostly take over 3 years to
complete any investigation which bars most people by the Limitations Act,
from taking their claims to the Court! Apparently in most cases the FOS and
the Independent Assessor (and Otelo etc) will take the side of the banks, so
does the FOS (etc) have a vested interest in the banks who contribute to
them? Isn’t this a conflict of interest against public interest?
- Governments sold off our
fuel industries; their reason they say was to regulate these industries to
be more efficient in order to provide us with a better service and lower
fuel charges. Can any politician say why there is now no control over these
industries and why we are charged at any rate the industry wishes?
- Since the abolishment of
Capital punishment and the Law that justice should be “seen” to be done, why
is it that criminals have more rights than moral people, and are allowed to
terrorize our old and infirm? Why do prisoners have better living standards’
than most of our taxpayers and deprived people? Why does the Law allow
paedophiles’ to attack our children and - then are privileged as
aforementioned? If new technology can establish that murder has taken place
then any murderer should forfeit their life. Surely criminals should not
have any rights over that of any moral person; and that the punishment
should fit the crime to be served in full. Likewise for any paedophiles’,
whereby our innocent children should be protected from these vile people?
- Why are most crimes and
stabbings in this country caused by foreigners, and why are they not
deported when caught?
- Why do governments turn a
blind eye to the criminal acts of perverts and paedophiles' in the Catholic
and any other Church?
- Why do governments
prosecute and stigmatize moral people in any event, who would reasonably
correct their children in order to teach them respect?
- Why don’t governments
bring in a system of National Service or the likes, in order to give
youngsters respect and the opportunity of learning a trade, of which would
not cost much more than just paying them dole or keeping them in prison to
exist as non functional nobody’s?
- If foreigners come into
our country, then surely they should abide by our Laws and rules - period,
just as we must abide by their Laws and rules if we enter into their
country?
- The British people help
fund the UK Patent Office, but patents are too expensive for any working
class people to obtain or enforce. Copyright is automatically covered by
English law by which most lawyers, barristers and government officials write
a book or two, so why isn’t patent also covered likewise? UK governments
suppress the working class inventors of this country, who will not even
attempt to put their ideas and inventions into place because of the patent
expense; of which some of these inventions could be the leading edge of
technology or could better our British working and living standards and
create more wealth for our society? If we taxpayers help fund an office and
then surely we should be reasonably allowed and guided to use it, isn’t this
fair and correct?
- If the monarchy and their
thousands of hangers-on say they are self sufficient, why must our taxes go
to support their lifestyles? If the monarchy says they are caring then why
don’t they cancel our payments we must make to them?
- Why do taxpayers fund our
universities to produce scientists who produce medical drugs - only for
large drug companies to take them over to make obscene profits; which make
it impossible for certain people to afford these drugs? The Hippocratic Oath
recites "first do no harm", and then should medical drugs be a non profit
system for our people?
- We did not have foot and
mouth in our country for about 30 years before the last outbreak, so
apparently it must have been brought into the British Isles. Domestic
animals are quarantined and must have a passport of good health to leave or
enter our country, so why aren't the same principals applied to farm animals
or people even; for there is a vast increase in viruses and diseases in the
UK since the governments’ open door policy. Will it be stopped?
- Alcohol and drugs abuse
impair individuals ability to function normally; so should it also be a
crime to use these substance in any workplace, including the government
sectors, whereby accidents and deaths can be caused and losses made in bad
decisions of work practices etc; and if any crime is committed then should
the laws be appropriately applied to cover any accidents, murder or
manslaughter to all who promote or allow it?
- Apparently most drug,
knife and gun crimes are linked to foreigners in our country. If any
foreigners are found guilty of such crimes then surely they should be
deported immediately, isn’t this correct?
- At least half of the
working people of the UK are held up in scamline 0845 telephone numbers and
the likes for at least 2 hours per week to be charged at a premium to either
listen to automated messages, music and advertising or just in a queue.
Considering at least half the nation is held up to be charged for a service
we have not agreed to, then under the Laws of England and Wales can we claim
for these caused losses?
- I also see that the banks
now withhold any maturing bond money for at least 10 to 30 days in some
“scams”, aren’t these criminal acts?
- David Cameron once said -
Labour borrowed billions from the taxpayers of this country – in an interest
free loan. Cameron also said the interest on government borrowing is going
to be 70 billion per year of which we will all pay 10p in the pound to cover
it each year. Can anyone say when we will we get back our 10% loan from
Labour plus interest, or any government?
- It seems that some people
cannot understand that most cannabis users are groomed from childhood, who
are usually reduced to non-functioning addicts who will undoubtedly move
onto harder drugs that will destroy young lives or eventually reduced them
to zombies who will be forever damaged and/or will cause cost and damage to
get their fix? Shouldn’t the government and legal system make powerful laws
to stop these illegal acts which cause unnecessary deaths and consequential
injuries and likely unlawful death?
- Government and their
quango’s side with their establishments. We are actually condemned to any
decision any quango or ombudsman wants to make. These bodies delay for at
least 3 years knowing that most people will be taken out of time by the
Limitation Act. They will also record people without asking for any express
permission to do so. I believe the latter is in breach of the Human Rights
Act. Also other establishments (like the DVLA) will abuse their powers to
glean more money from the people. I would ask if these civil servant
procedures are by government directive, because there is no government body
that anyone can complain. Isn’t the latter why government wants rid of the
Human Rights Act also?
- Past government said they
want to increase migration in order to tax migrants to help pay for our
increasing pensioners. Can somebody buy them a calculator! I will not give a
calculation because the government doesn’t know how many migrants they
illegally allow into Britain? There are also millions of unemployed Britons
and some public sector workers and their family’s to support from private
sector taxes. There are hundreds and thousands of British youngsters who we
must keep on benefits, and most will never ever get a job. There are
millions of migrants who have not and will never work at all, including
their extended families, we keep on benefits. There are millions of illegal
migrants and their extended family’s that abuse our system including the NHS.
Does government really believe that by bringing in more migrants this will
help our economy? Are governments unashamedly damaging our British people’s
assets and future by bringing in more migrants?
- Government cannot
understand that taxpayers fund the government and every quango and
establishment associated with it entirely. To make it a simple equation for
them, I will cite the apparent private sector taxpayer’s original “one-pot”.
When the public sector is paid out of the one-pot, they pay taxes that go
back into the original one-pot. Therefore the only taxes are the private
sector taxes of the original one-pot. So it’s no good the public sector
throwing their hands up to say “we pay taxes also”, because clearly it is
the same money from the private sector tax money in the very first instance
of the original “one-pot”. So no public sector worker actually makes a
monitory contribution to the original one-pot. Yes of course we all
contribute to society and that is a good thing and that is why the private
sector funds it all. So let’s get a better deal for our private sector
workers, would you agree?
- It is cited that paedophiles and the likes
have infiltrated the government, legal system and the Church? Likewise I am
told that some migrants have
infiltrated the same to get into prominent jobs where they can change the
laws and prioritize for their agenda? Is it a fact that the Britons are
becoming second class citizens in their own land? Is it a fact that we are
being manipulated from within?
I have much more valid
information over this and my book, but why should I reveal it to be plagiarised
by you know who.
Cordially,
David Jones
Legal Notice: We may record telephone calls for reference, record and
recollection, and if you do not agree with this please use email or written
letter. We inform you here that this information can be highly confidential and
can also be subject to patent and copyright and all rights reserved, of which
information is legally privileged. Please do not record, copy, forward, disclose
or use any part without my written consent. Internet communications cannot be
guaranteed secure, error or virus-free. I do not accept any liability for any
errors or omissions. By you receiving or accessing this Legal Notice is
acknowledgement that you agree with its contents and as confidential without
prejudice information.
CLICK ON THE RED ARROW to HOME PAGE
|